• 4 min read
A Case for Digital Commissioning in Industrial Automation
This report will investigate how Virtual Commissioning adds value to the management and financing of high-complexity engineering projects.
Stakeholders
Customer Stakeholder:
- John Smith operates a packaged goods manufacturing firm
- Direct competition with international companies is pressuring John Smith to lower costs, which will require an increase efficiency and an increase in scale
- To do this, John Smith needs to invest in a new automated assembly line
Automation Firm Stakeholder:
- These engineering projects are high-complexity and high-risk
- They require specialists to coordinate throughout the entire process (Concepting → Site Acceptance Test (SAT))
- Liability is distributed in the contract with penalties, such as liquidated damages, on project delays
Financing Stakeholder:
- Simple equipment is typically funded through internal cash or debt arrangements tied to the asset itself
- Highly specialized equipment has a low resale value because of its niche application
- Low resale value makes it higher risk for the financing firm
- Since high complexity projects are difficult to estimate, they inherently have higher risk
The Engineering Process
The list below identifies the typical industrial automation project:
- Request for Quotation (RFQ)
- Concepting/Applications
- Proposal
- Kickoff & Requirements Specification
- Mechanical & Electrical Design Review 1 (25%)
- Mechanical & Electrical Design Review 2 (50%)
- Mechanical & Electrical Design Review 3 (75%)
- Mechanical & Electrical Design Review 4 (90%)
- Factory Acceptance Test (FAT)
- Implementation
- Site Acceptance Test (SAT)
- (Optional) Post-Implementation Audit
The primary sources of friction in this process are:
- Coordinating between different firms
- Handoff between departments
- Rebuilding the assembly line for SAT
- Distribution of risk
Virtual Commissioning
Virtual commissioning addresses these sources of friction by:
- Producing more accurate estimates
- Clarifying project requirements
- Enabling the customer to view and simulate the design at each design review
- Being able to see where everything goes, piece by piece, when rebuilding the machine at the customers site, for SAT
The NVIDIA Industrial (Physical) AI ecosystem can address these sources of friction by:
- Using OpenUSD to track metadata of each mechanical or electrical component
- Status, revision, design file location, stakeholders, ownership
- Produce cross-platform Omniverse simulations for controls and industrial robots, to demonstrate cycle times
- Customers can access the full 3D model of the automated assembly line
- Workers can access of the full 3D model of the automated assembly line when building and re-building the machine, with all information for each component
The high-level value for stakeholders:
-
Improved reporting to all stakeholders
- Clearer project management KPIs
- Organization of information when discussing project requirements
-
Improved understanding across departments
- All project information is tracked as revisions are made
- Simulation provides clear technical requirements
- Anyone can view the project in its entirety before it is built
-
Lower risk to all stakeholders
- Improved project tracking results in less ambiguity and direct ownership to individuals and departments
- Ability to compare quote to reality at all stages in the design process